118 research outputs found

    An Introduction To The Rules Of Evidence Applicable To Collection Cases In Maryland Trial Courts

    Get PDF
    This class handout introduces students to the basic concepts of evidence using examples and language from the Maryland Rules of Evidence

    Law Reviews and Technology: Copyright Law from Noah Webster to Tasini and the Importance of Written Contracts

    Get PDF
    This handout from a 2001 presentation for the National Conference of Law Reviews outlines the intersection between copyright and contract law, particularly as it pertains to authors assigning the copyright of law review articles to the journal publishing the article

    The Rules Of Evidence Applicable In Maryland Trial Courts

    Get PDF

    I\u27m Going to Dinner with Frank : Admissibility of Nontestimonial Statements of Intent to Prove the Actions of Someone other than the Speaker—and the Role of the Due Process Clause

    Get PDF
    A woman tells her roommate that she is going out to dinner with Frank that evening. The next morning her battered body is found along a country road outside of town. In Frank’s trial for her murder, is her statement to her roommate admissible to place Frank with her that night? Since the Court’s 2004 Crawford decision, the confrontation clause is inapplicable to nontestimonial hearsay such as this. American jurisdictions are widely divided on the question of admissibility under their rules of evidence, however. Many say absolutely not. A sizeable number unequivocally say yes. A small number say yes, but condition admissibility on the proof of corroborating evidence that Frank met her. Although this third compromise approach has much to recommend it, the author argues that, as presently framed, it violates the rule adopted in the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Idaho v. Wright applying the confrontation clause. The author makes several other novel arguments. First, she argues that Wright continues to apply to nontestimonial hearsay, but via the due process clause. Next she suggests that jurisdictions may constitutionally achieve the same result, however, in one of two ways: (1) they could codify the corroboration requirement in their definition of the applicable evidence rule, the state of mind hearsay exception; or (2) through their case law, they could admit the hearsay statement without requiring corroborating evidence, but invoke a corroboration requirement when evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, for due process reasons, at the close of the case

    The Copyright Notice Requirement in the United States: A Proposed Amendment Concerning Deliberate Omissions of Notice

    Get PDF

    Reforming the Criminal Law: University of Baltimore School of Law Group Goes to Annapolis

    Get PDF

    Hearsay and the Confrontation Clause

    Get PDF

    Fact, Fiction And Proof In The 21st Century: Evidence And Credibility For Fact Finding By Administrative Law Judges

    Get PDF
    Handout from a panel at the NAALJ Annual Conference covering credibility

    Self-Authentication of Certified Copies of Business Records

    Get PDF

    Maryland\u27s Adoption of a Code of Evidence

    Get PDF
    This short paper written just after the adoption of the Maryland Rules of Evidence explains the rules and the process it took to adapt the Federal Rules of Evidence for use in Maryland
    • …
    corecore